Throughout the context provided, there are several mentions that provide insight into opinions about which side may win in the discussed legal case:

1. At 00:56:03, the speaker expresses a belief that the judge can see beyond a pure black and white perspective of the case, indicating a sense that the judge may favor a nuanced decision that isn't strictly for or against one side.

2. At 01:04:03, the speaker suggests that the share price of Spirit is likely to go up, which implies that there is an expectation that the merger will go through, or at least that the market is leaning towards that outcome.

3. At 00:02:04, after having been "on the fence" about the outcome, the speaker became bullish for the defendants during the trial, suggesting a belief that the defense has a strong chance of winning.

4. At 00:15:01, the speaker discusses the defendant's expert, Dr. Hill, who claimed there was no harm to rebut, indicating that consumers prefer JetBlue, which may suggest confidence in the defense's position.

5. There is a recurrent theme that the judge is considering a dynamic industry and balancing many factors, as seen at 00:04:33 and 00:48:06, which might hint at openness to a decision that isn't a straightforward win for either side.

6. At 00:19:00, there is mention that the judge is focused on timing differences in terms of potential harm to consumers, which could affect his decision on whether to tailor any injunctions to ensure timing is synced with market dynamics, again suggesting a nuanced outcome.

7. At 01:05:00, the mention of a current event not being evidence but being mentioned because it was felt necessary may indicate a belief that it won’t significantly sway the judge's decision.

8. At 00:53:08, the speaker tries to understand why some believe the government was winning, pointing out that they see presumptive markets and believe there is harm from elimination and higher pricing.

9. At 00:59:04, the speaker is asked about the odds of the merger going through or being blocked. Although they do not provide specific odds, the question suggests there is still some level of uncertainty about the outcome.

Overall, these timestamps reflect a range of opinions with some leaning towards the defense, some bullish on the outcome of the merger, and an overall sense that the judge’s decision will be complex and consider many factors.